Certifications: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
It is the sole discretion of a C.M whether or not the P.I has performed satisfactorily. If it is the C.M's belief that the P.I did ''not'' perform satisfactorily, they may politely state as such, and then ask the P.I to try again with them at a later date or with another C.M. If the P.I feels this unfair, they may refer the situation to an EDC leadership member for remediation. | It is the sole discretion of a C.M whether or not the P.I has performed satisfactorily. If it is the C.M's belief that the P.I did ''not'' perform satisfactorily, they may politely state as such, and then ask the P.I to try again with them at a later date or with another C.M. If the P.I feels this unfair, they may refer the situation to an EDC leadership member for remediation. | ||
If the C.M believes the P.I has performed all items satisfactorily, they will report in a designated location that the certification occurred. A member of EDC leadership will perform a quick sanity check that everything seems above board. Then, either they, or someone else who has access to the EnduraNet database, will mark the P.I as being certified. This makes it official and permanently recorded. The P.I then review EnduraNet to see when the certification will expire, if ever. | If the C.M believes the P.I has performed all items satisfactorily, they will report in a designated location that the certification occurred. A member of EDC leadership will perform a quick sanity check that everything seems above board. Then, either they, or someone else who has access to the EnduraNet database, will mark the P.I as being certified. This makes it official and permanently recorded. The P.I can then review EnduraNet to see when the certification will expire, if ever. | ||
== Certification expiry == | == Certification expiry == | ||